Sunday, September 21, 2008

week 8 presentation

Week 8 - The Ethics of Porn of the Net

This is an interesting article that questions pornography on the internet. Kath Albury undertook research in the field of, “representations of heterosexuality in media and popular culture”. She raises several questions regarding moral and ethically standards in the pornographic world of the internet.

The article begins with Albury asking the underlying question of the article, ‘What is wrong with pornography?’ In answering this question, Albury makes it clear that one must look to the question of morality between the different sectors of society. Firstly she makes reference to Judeo-Christian’s who share a rather conservative view regarding pornography. They strongly believe that sex is something private between married couples, and should be kept in the bedroom. They believe that pornography encourages immoral sex and is therefore immoral. She then presents the Marxist view, which is somewhat similar to a radical feminist view. Essentially the Marxist view is one which believes that ‘porn performers’ are alienated from experiencing their own sexuality since their job is the performance of sex therefore making it labour rather than something which should be for recreation or procreation. Albury then goes on to discuss the feminist approach to pornography making it clear that the vast majority of feminists (largely radical) believe that pornography promotes the exploitation of women. She goes on to say that pornography encourages a sexualised view of women by men (the prime group who access porn) and makes women appear as more of a commodity therefore allowing them to be objectified.

Albury then goes on to discuss that while porn on the internet may be considered immoral and perhaps even unethical, it does allow for certain sub-sections of society to express themselves. In terms of mainstream pornography it is clear that they favour a rather unrealistic beauty, i.e. women with ‘silicone implants, taut aerobicised loins, fake tan, false nails, big hair and Brazilian waxes’, when the reality is that this ideal is far from the natural attributes of everyday women. Through pornography, largely via the influx of amateur pornography producers, women and men are able to move away from perceived norms and express themselves for their own unique sexual beauty. Albury makes reference to several websites that encourage a different view of the sexualised woman and man, for example the ‘hair to stay’ website, which encourages women to embrace their natural beauty including their bodily hair.

She concludes the article by questioning whether pornography on the internet is unethical. Essentially it is up to the individual person based on their own beliefs and opinions to decide whether porn on the internet is unethical. This is an interesting article that calls into question a rather controversial issue. Personally I am unsure where I stand regarding this topic. I do agree with the feminist approach presented in terms of the sexualisation of women and how mainstream pornography largely promotes a rather unrealistic woman, therefore often sending out the wrong message. However I am a supporter of freedom of expression, so provided the pornography does not overstep the law it is up the individual to do as they please.

This is an interesting topic and I am excited to hear your opinions. Some questions to consider would be firstly what is your opinion of pornography on the internet? Do you believe it to be immoral or rather as an opportunity for people to express themselves via another form on the internet? Also perhaps it would be interesting to look at your personal beliefs regarding the moral and ethical arguments that surround the issue.

I look forward to hearing your responses.

6 comments:

Jakki said...

Personally I'm quite neutral on the matter - I think if that's what people want to put up online then that's fine - I don't need to see it though. It's a woman's choice if they want to be objectified like that, and if that's their idea of feminism and empowerment then I really don't have a problem with that. I think the morality of pornography definitely comes under freedom of speech/expression and it would question the ideal if any authority were to impose a ban on pornography in general.

There is also the question of what is okay to broadcast and what isn't (if they happened to restrict it). I mean just look at some arthouse films...its hard to regulate!!! I think the more important question is where the porn originated from...if its from the illegal sex trade or industry then it's definitely illegal and unethical(which should result in punishment). So I guess pornography sites should be monitored somewhat by authorities in accordance to this matter - kind of like what the FBI does with chat rooms. Banning porn online is very drastic though...might as well ban Playboy and whatnot in the process too!

Maija said...

I think Jakki made a valid point conserning the art house cinema. Why should one type of film be accepted as art and then another, not far from the content dissaproved as porn? Mh, well I guess that's a very debatable question, and as Jakki said, we would need to think where porn originates from.
In the reading the author mentioned a couple who had a fetish(I think peeing on each other)and they liked to post videos of their act online. Someone on the industry got interested and offered them some money for the clips. Yeh, I guess this could be classified as the opportunity to "express" one self and consider it as 'innocent' but it seems to be that as soon as someone starts making money from it, it becomes just porn. So maybe what i'm trying to say is that all the people who spend millions on porn every year are the ones who make porn immoral and disgusting.

jamesbaker said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jamesbaker said...

Personally, I don't have a problem with porn. It's an industry that is making alot of money and if thats what people want to watch in their spare time then fine.

My main qualm with it though is when it becomes accessible to young kids. Having sexual intercourse is by no means normal, and their is alot of acting involved to make it sell. Children should not see this as it does not give a fair representation of what sex is about. There is also alot of gross stuff out there (like the fetish stuff described) that really should not be seen by people in their adolescence.

I also dislike the way porn is marketed. Getting compromising images and writing in your email is an invasion of privacy and really annoying at times.

Of course there is also the exploitation of youths in the movies (ie 'performing'), but I don't think that even warrants a mention here as we all know that this type of thing is wrong.

Ka Hung Chan said...

Porn is considered as immoral or unethical as it has transformed sex to become profitable and marketable. The article is more concerned about whether online pornography is a kind of 'free speech/expression' amongst adults or rather restricted by authoritives as it is 'abnormal'. However, the most importance and efficiency is that to restrict the distribution and the access of porn materials amongst children and teenagers (esp. children pornography as harmful for a child's mental development), which will affect them as considering "sex is tradable and playable".

I guess the rapid spread of online porn is associated with the reason that a part of adults cannot be fulfiled, or satisfied with the actual sexual desire in real-life, and unable to discuss the problems they faced (as it is shameful to talk about this publicly). Thus they seek an alternative way, to satisfy their desire privately. It is just my interpretation of the widely spread of online pornography and sexual materials on the Internet.

Anonymous said...

On the discussion of arthouse and porn, I find it interesting that money and profits are what casts a lot of the disapproval on porn. Don't arthouse films make money too?... Hmm?

Aside from the obvious issues of child pornography and that children are able to access porn, i stand pretty neutral on the topic. I don't really think there is a problem with porn in whatever way it is portrayed (except with children!). I think the morality in pornography is really up to the individual.

I do agree that pornography does allow for freedom of speech and expression. I find it interesting that a lot of people jump on the issue of the objectification of women in pornography. Personally, I do side with that standpoint that women do get objectified in pornography but maybe that's another form of expression for some women? Maybe the fact that they are publicly performing sex acts and being sexually promiscuous is a way to say "hey, i'm a sexually liberated woman".